|
| 1 | +# Full-Text Search Index Research for TanStack DB |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Context |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +Based on [PR #950](https://github.com/TanStack/db/pull/950), TanStack DB is moving toward opt-in, tree-shakeable indexing. This document researches JavaScript full-text search options that could integrate with this architecture. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +## Requirements for TanStack DB Integration |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +Based on the existing `IndexInterface` in `packages/db/src/indexes/base-index.ts`, a full-text search index would need to: |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +1. **Implement core interface methods**: `add()`, `remove()`, `update()`, `build()`, `clear()` |
| 12 | +2. **Support dynamic updates**: Documents can be added/removed at any time (unlike Lunr.js which is immutable) |
| 13 | +3. **Be tree-shakeable**: Support lazy loading via async resolver pattern |
| 14 | +4. **Work in browser and Node.js**: No server-side dependencies |
| 15 | +5. **Be reasonably small**: Bundle size matters for client-side use |
| 16 | +6. **Support relevance scoring**: Full-text search implies ranked results |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +### Additional Full-Text Specific Operations |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +A full-text index would likely extend `IndexInterface` with: |
| 21 | +- `search(query: string, options?: SearchOptions): SearchResult[]` |
| 22 | +- `suggest(prefix: string): string[]` (autocomplete) |
| 23 | +- `highlight(docId, query): HighlightedText` |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +--- |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +## JavaScript Full-Text Search Libraries Comparison |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +### 1. Orama (Recommended) |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +**GitHub**: https://github.com/oramasearch/orama |
| 32 | +**License**: Apache 2.0 |
| 33 | +**Bundle Size**: ~2KB gzipped (core) |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +#### Strengths |
| 36 | +- ✅ **Already used by TanStack**: tanstack.com uses Orama for search |
| 37 | +- ✅ **Tiny bundle**: Under 2KB for full-text search |
| 38 | +- ✅ **Dynamic updates**: Full add/remove/update support |
| 39 | +- ✅ **Modern TypeScript**: Written in TypeScript with excellent types |
| 40 | +- ✅ **Feature-rich**: Typo tolerance, stemming (30 languages), facets, geo-search |
| 41 | +- ✅ **Vector search support**: Enables hybrid full-text + semantic search |
| 42 | +- ✅ **Microsecond latency**: Very fast search performance |
| 43 | +- ✅ **Plugin architecture**: Extensible design matches TanStack DB's philosophy |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +#### API Example |
| 46 | +```typescript |
| 47 | +import { create, insert, remove, search } from '@orama/orama' |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +const db = create({ |
| 50 | + schema: { |
| 51 | + title: 'string', |
| 52 | + content: 'string', |
| 53 | + tags: 'string[]' |
| 54 | + } |
| 55 | +}) |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +insert(db, { title: 'Hello World', content: 'Full-text search example', tags: ['demo'] }) |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +const results = search(db, { |
| 60 | + term: 'search', |
| 61 | + properties: ['title', 'content'], |
| 62 | + tolerance: 1 // typo tolerance |
| 63 | +}) |
| 64 | +``` |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +#### Integration Considerations |
| 67 | +- Functional API (not class-based) - would need wrapper |
| 68 | +- Schema must be defined upfront |
| 69 | +- Could be exposed as `@tanstack/db-search` or similar |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +--- |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +### 2. MiniSearch |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +**GitHub**: https://github.com/lucaong/minisearch |
| 76 | +**License**: MIT |
| 77 | +**Bundle Size**: ~7KB gzipped |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +#### Strengths |
| 80 | +- ✅ **Memory efficient**: Designed for constrained environments |
| 81 | +- ✅ **Dynamic updates**: Full add/remove support |
| 82 | +- ✅ **Auto-suggestions**: Built-in autocomplete |
| 83 | +- ✅ **Fuzzy search**: Configurable typo tolerance |
| 84 | +- ✅ **Simple API**: Easy to integrate |
| 85 | +- ✅ **Zero dependencies**: No external deps |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +#### Weaknesses |
| 88 | +- ❌ **No stemming built-in**: Must be added manually |
| 89 | +- ❌ **Larger than Orama**: ~3.5x bigger bundle |
| 90 | +- ❌ **No vector search**: Full-text only |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +#### API Example |
| 93 | +```typescript |
| 94 | +import MiniSearch from 'minisearch' |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +const miniSearch = new MiniSearch({ |
| 97 | + fields: ['title', 'content'], |
| 98 | + storeFields: ['title'] |
| 99 | +}) |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +miniSearch.addAll(documents) |
| 102 | +miniSearch.add({ id: 1, title: 'New doc', content: '...' }) |
| 103 | +miniSearch.remove({ id: 1 }) |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +const results = miniSearch.search('query', { fuzzy: 0.2, prefix: true }) |
| 106 | +``` |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +#### Integration Considerations |
| 109 | +- Class-based API fits well with TanStack DB's index pattern |
| 110 | +- Would need ID-based tracking like existing `BTreeIndex` |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +--- |
| 113 | + |
| 114 | +### 3. FlexSearch |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | +**GitHub**: https://github.com/nextapps-de/flexsearch |
| 117 | +**License**: Apache 2.0 |
| 118 | +**Bundle Size**: 4.5KB (light) to 16.3KB (full) gzipped |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | +#### Strengths |
| 121 | +- ✅ **Extremely fast**: Claims fastest JS search library |
| 122 | +- ✅ **Web Workers support**: Parallel indexing/searching |
| 123 | +- ✅ **Persistent indexes**: Can serialize to storage |
| 124 | +- ✅ **Phonetic search**: Advanced matching algorithms |
| 125 | +- ✅ **Multiple presets**: Configurable memory/speed tradeoffs |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +#### Weaknesses |
| 128 | +- ❌ **Complex API**: Steeper learning curve |
| 129 | +- ❌ **Inconsistent documentation**: API has changed across versions |
| 130 | +- ❌ **Memory vs speed tradeoff**: Fast modes use more memory |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +#### API Example |
| 133 | +```typescript |
| 134 | +import { Document } from 'flexsearch' |
| 135 | + |
| 136 | +const index = new Document({ |
| 137 | + document: { |
| 138 | + id: 'id', |
| 139 | + index: ['title', 'content'] |
| 140 | + } |
| 141 | +}) |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | +index.add({ id: 1, title: 'Hello', content: 'World' }) |
| 144 | +index.remove(1) |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | +const results = index.search('hello') |
| 147 | +``` |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | +#### Integration Considerations |
| 150 | +- Document search mode matches TanStack DB's collection model |
| 151 | +- Would need careful version pinning due to API instability |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | +--- |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | +### 4. Fuse.js |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | +**GitHub**: https://github.com/krisk/Fuse |
| 158 | +**License**: Apache 2.0 |
| 159 | +**Bundle Size**: ~12KB gzipped |
| 160 | + |
| 161 | +#### Strengths |
| 162 | +- ✅ **Fuzzy search focus**: Best-in-class approximate matching |
| 163 | +- ✅ **Weighted fields**: Different importance per field |
| 164 | +- ✅ **Well maintained**: Large community |
| 165 | +- ✅ **Simple API**: Easy to use |
| 166 | + |
| 167 | +#### Weaknesses |
| 168 | +- ❌ **No inverted index**: Scans all documents (O(n)) |
| 169 | +- ❌ **Poor performance at scale**: Not suitable for large datasets |
| 170 | +- ❌ **No tokenization**: Matches substrings, not words |
| 171 | + |
| 172 | +#### API Example |
| 173 | +```typescript |
| 174 | +import Fuse from 'fuse.js' |
| 175 | + |
| 176 | +const fuse = new Fuse(documents, { |
| 177 | + keys: ['title', 'content'], |
| 178 | + threshold: 0.3 |
| 179 | +}) |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +const results = fuse.search('query') |
| 182 | +``` |
| 183 | + |
| 184 | +#### Integration Considerations |
| 185 | +- **Not recommended** for full-text search - better for small fuzzy matching |
| 186 | +- Could be useful as a lightweight "fuzzy filter" on top of other indexes |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | +--- |
| 189 | + |
| 190 | +### 5. Lunr.js |
| 191 | + |
| 192 | +**GitHub**: https://github.com/olivernn/lunr.js |
| 193 | +**License**: MIT |
| 194 | +**Bundle Size**: ~8KB gzipped |
| 195 | + |
| 196 | +#### Strengths |
| 197 | +- ✅ **Built-in stemming**: Multiple language support |
| 198 | +- ✅ **TF-IDF scoring**: Good relevance ranking |
| 199 | +- ✅ **Mature**: Battle-tested library |
| 200 | + |
| 201 | +#### Weaknesses |
| 202 | +- ❌ **Immutable index**: Cannot add/remove documents after build |
| 203 | +- ❌ **No maintenance**: Last commit was years ago |
| 204 | +- ❌ **Rebuild required**: Any change requires full reindex |
| 205 | + |
| 206 | +#### Integration Considerations |
| 207 | +- **Not recommended** due to immutable index - doesn't fit TanStack DB's real-time update model |
| 208 | + |
| 209 | +--- |
| 210 | + |
| 211 | +### 6. Build Custom (Inverted Index) |
| 212 | + |
| 213 | +Building a minimal custom full-text index is feasible for basic needs. |
| 214 | + |
| 215 | +#### Core Components |
| 216 | +```typescript |
| 217 | +class FullTextIndex implements IndexInterface { |
| 218 | + private invertedIndex = new Map<string, Set<Key>>() // term -> doc keys |
| 219 | + private docTerms = new Map<Key, Set<string>>() // doc -> terms (for removal) |
| 220 | + |
| 221 | + add(key: Key, item: any) { |
| 222 | + const text = this.extractText(item) |
| 223 | + const terms = this.tokenize(text) |
| 224 | + |
| 225 | + this.docTerms.set(key, new Set(terms)) |
| 226 | + for (const term of terms) { |
| 227 | + if (!this.invertedIndex.has(term)) { |
| 228 | + this.invertedIndex.set(term, new Set()) |
| 229 | + } |
| 230 | + this.invertedIndex.get(term)!.add(key) |
| 231 | + } |
| 232 | + } |
| 233 | + |
| 234 | + remove(key: Key, item: any) { |
| 235 | + const terms = this.docTerms.get(key) |
| 236 | + if (!terms) return |
| 237 | + |
| 238 | + for (const term of terms) { |
| 239 | + this.invertedIndex.get(term)?.delete(key) |
| 240 | + } |
| 241 | + this.docTerms.delete(key) |
| 242 | + } |
| 243 | + |
| 244 | + search(query: string): Set<Key> { |
| 245 | + const queryTerms = this.tokenize(query) |
| 246 | + // AND logic: intersection of all term matches |
| 247 | + let result: Set<Key> | null = null |
| 248 | + for (const term of queryTerms) { |
| 249 | + const matches = this.invertedIndex.get(term) ?? new Set() |
| 250 | + result = result ? intersection(result, matches) : new Set(matches) |
| 251 | + } |
| 252 | + return result ?? new Set() |
| 253 | + } |
| 254 | + |
| 255 | + private tokenize(text: string): string[] { |
| 256 | + return text.toLowerCase() |
| 257 | + .split(/\W+/) |
| 258 | + .filter(t => t.length > 1) |
| 259 | + } |
| 260 | +} |
| 261 | +``` |
| 262 | + |
| 263 | +#### Strengths |
| 264 | +- ✅ **Zero dependencies**: Complete control |
| 265 | +- ✅ **Minimal size**: Can be very small |
| 266 | +- ✅ **Perfect fit**: Matches TanStack DB interface exactly |
| 267 | + |
| 268 | +#### Weaknesses |
| 269 | +- ❌ **No advanced features**: No fuzzy, stemming, scoring |
| 270 | +- ❌ **Maintenance burden**: Must build everything |
| 271 | +- ❌ **No relevance ranking**: Basic boolean matching only |
| 272 | + |
| 273 | +--- |
| 274 | + |
| 275 | +## Recommendation |
| 276 | + |
| 277 | +### Primary: **Orama** |
| 278 | + |
| 279 | +Orama is the strongest candidate because: |
| 280 | + |
| 281 | +1. **Already in TanStack ecosystem** - tanstack.com uses it, so there's familiarity |
| 282 | +2. **Smallest bundle** - Under 2KB for core functionality |
| 283 | +3. **Most features** - Typo tolerance, stemming, facets, vector search |
| 284 | +4. **Modern TypeScript** - Excellent type safety |
| 285 | +5. **Apache 2.0** - Compatible license |
| 286 | +6. **Active maintenance** - Regular updates and community |
| 287 | + |
| 288 | +### Implementation Approach |
| 289 | + |
| 290 | +```typescript |
| 291 | +// packages/db-search/src/fulltext-index.ts |
| 292 | +import { create, insert, remove, search, type Orama } from '@orama/orama' |
| 293 | +import type { BaseIndex, IndexInterface } from '@tanstack/db' |
| 294 | + |
| 295 | +export class FullTextIndex<TKey extends string | number> |
| 296 | + extends BaseIndex<TKey> |
| 297 | + implements IndexInterface<TKey> { |
| 298 | + |
| 299 | + private db: Orama<any> |
| 300 | + private keyField: string |
| 301 | + private textFields: string[] |
| 302 | + |
| 303 | + constructor( |
| 304 | + id: number, |
| 305 | + expression: BasicExpression, |
| 306 | + name?: string, |
| 307 | + options?: FullTextIndexOptions |
| 308 | + ) { |
| 309 | + super(id, expression, name) |
| 310 | + this.textFields = options?.fields ?? [] |
| 311 | + this.keyField = options?.keyField ?? 'id' |
| 312 | + |
| 313 | + this.db = create({ |
| 314 | + schema: this.buildSchema() |
| 315 | + }) |
| 316 | + } |
| 317 | + |
| 318 | + add(key: TKey, item: any): void { |
| 319 | + insert(this.db, { [this.keyField]: key, ...item }) |
| 320 | + } |
| 321 | + |
| 322 | + remove(key: TKey, item: any): void { |
| 323 | + remove(this.db, key) |
| 324 | + } |
| 325 | + |
| 326 | + // Full-text specific method |
| 327 | + search(query: string, options?: SearchOptions): SearchResult<TKey>[] { |
| 328 | + return search(this.db, { |
| 329 | + term: query, |
| 330 | + properties: this.textFields, |
| 331 | + ...options |
| 332 | + }) |
| 333 | + } |
| 334 | + |
| 335 | + // For basic IndexInterface compatibility |
| 336 | + lookup(operation: 'search', value: string): Set<TKey> { |
| 337 | + const results = this.search(value) |
| 338 | + return new Set(results.map(r => r.id as TKey)) |
| 339 | + } |
| 340 | +} |
| 341 | +``` |
| 342 | + |
| 343 | +### Alternative: MiniSearch |
| 344 | + |
| 345 | +If Orama's functional API is problematic, MiniSearch's class-based design is a good fallback: |
| 346 | +- Larger bundle (~7KB) but still reasonable |
| 347 | +- Simpler integration with existing index patterns |
| 348 | +- MIT license (very permissive) |
| 349 | + |
| 350 | +--- |
| 351 | + |
| 352 | +## Bundle Size Comparison |
| 353 | + |
| 354 | +| Library | Size (gzip) | Dynamic Updates | Fuzzy | Stemming | |
| 355 | +|---------|-------------|-----------------|-------|----------| |
| 356 | +| Orama | ~2KB | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ (30 langs) | |
| 357 | +| MiniSearch | ~7KB | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ (addon) | |
| 358 | +| FlexSearch (light) | ~4.5KB | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | |
| 359 | +| Fuse.js | ~12KB | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | |
| 360 | +| Lunr.js | ~8KB | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | |
| 361 | +| Custom | ~1KB | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | |
| 362 | + |
| 363 | +--- |
| 364 | + |
| 365 | +## Next Steps |
| 366 | + |
| 367 | +1. **Prototype Orama integration** as `@tanstack/db-search` |
| 368 | +2. **Design extended IndexInterface** for full-text operations |
| 369 | +3. **Add to tree-shakeable entry points** per PR #950 pattern |
| 370 | +4. **Benchmark** against existing BTreeIndex for mixed workloads |
| 371 | +5. **Document** field configuration and search options |
| 372 | + |
| 373 | +--- |
| 374 | + |
| 375 | +## Sources |
| 376 | + |
| 377 | +- [Orama GitHub](https://github.com/oramasearch/orama) |
| 378 | +- [MiniSearch GitHub](https://github.com/lucaong/minisearch) |
| 379 | +- [FlexSearch GitHub](https://github.com/nextapps-de/flexsearch) |
| 380 | +- [Fuse.js](https://www.fusejs.io/) |
| 381 | +- [Lunr.js](https://lunrjs.com/) |
| 382 | +- [JS Search Library Comparisons](https://npm-compare.com/elasticlunr,flexsearch,fuse.js,minisearch) |
| 383 | +- [Best Search Packages for JavaScript](https://mattermost.com/blog/best-search-packages-for-javascript/) |
| 384 | +- [Top 6 JavaScript Search Libraries](https://byby.dev/js-search-libraries) |
| 385 | +- [Inverted Index Implementation](https://www.30secondsofcode.org/js/s/tf-idf-inverted-index/) |
0 commit comments