Proposal: Native PRFAQ generator /speckit.prfaq

[cruschke]

The Problem
When using Spec Kit it’s easy to get "artifact overwhelmed". When building a feature we have the user stories, plan, contracts and research, but we do not have a solid "North Star" for why we're building the feature.

The Idea
Add a native PRFAQ (Press Release / Frequently Asked Questions) generator. This synthesizes the technical specs into a one-page "vision" document based on the Amazon Working Backwards framework.

Why it helps:

• Clarity: Provides a plain-English summary for stakeholders before they dive into the technical weeds.
• Consistency: Standardizes the "Product Vision" format across all my projects and features.
• Focus: Acts as a guardrail to ensure technical artifacts align with the core problem.

Proposed Output (PRFAQ.md):

• Press Release: The "hook," the problem, and a fictional user quote.
• External FAQ: Real-world user questions (e.g., "Is this free?", "How do I migrate?").
• Internal FAQ: Tough technical/business questions (e.g., "Why this architecture?", "What are the risks?").

[cruschke]

Press Release: Spec Kit Adds PRFAQ Generator to End "Artifact Overwhelm"
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

BERLIN, Germany — Spec Kit today announced speckit.prfaq, a new tool to help developers bridge the gap between technical specs and product vision. While Spec Kit excels at generating deep technical artifacts like ERDs and OpenAPI schemas, the new PRFAQ feature ensures the "why" isn't lost in the "how."

By adopting the Amazon-style "Working Backwards" framework, speckit.prfaq synthesizes complex technical data into a one-page narrative. "It’s the North Star for your project," says a lead contributor. "It provides instant clarity for stakeholders before anyone touches a line of code."

The feature is available now via the Spec Kit CLI.

External FAQ (User-Facing)
Q: Why should I use this?
A: To ensure your technical specs actually solve a real user problem. It’s an "Executive Summary" that keeps everyone aligned.

Q: Does it replace my technical docs?
A: No. it sits on top of them as a guide to ensure your ERDs and User Stories stay focused on the core mission.

Internal FAQ (Dev-Facing)
Q: How does it stay accurate?
A: It pulls directly from your existing context folder (Business Rules, Personas) to ensure the narrative matches the actual technical constraints.

Q: Isn't this just more "fluff" to maintain?
A: No. It’s a "measure twice, cut once" tool. Defining the vision early prevents expensive technical pivots later.