Skip to content

Some noxfile.py files are still using blacken #16018

@jskeet

Description

@jskeet

Determine this is the right repository

  • I determined this is the correct repository in which to report this bug.

Summary of the issue

We should use the same code formatting across all packages.

Currently, 7 packages don't use ruff:

$ grep -L ruff packages/*/noxfile.py

Results:

  • packages/google-api-core/noxfile.py
  • packages/google-auth-httplib2/noxfile.py
  • packages/google-auth-oauthlib/noxfile.py
  • packages/google-cloud-core/noxfile.py
  • packages/google-cloud-dns/noxfile.py
  • packages/google-cloud-runtimeconfig/noxfile.py
  • packages/google-cloud-testutils/noxfile.py
  • packages/proto-plus/noxfile.py

API client name and version

No response

Reproduction steps: code

file: main.py

   def reproduce():
    # complete code here

Reproduction steps: supporting files

file: mydata.csv

alpha,1,3
beta,2,5

Reproduction steps: actual results

file: output.txtmydata.csv

Calculated: foo

Reproduction steps: expected results

file: output.txtmydata.csv

Calculated: bar

OS & version + platform

No response

Python environment

No response

Python dependencies

No response

Additional context

No response

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    triage meI really want to be triaged.type: bugError or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions