Which open issues are considered the best entry points for someone who has already read the README?

[sudoUgando]

help

[EimanTahir071]

help

1. Help wanted”/ good first issue: issues explicitly designed for contributors; typically clearer scope and expectations.
2. Bug or “regression” issues with reproduction steps: you’ll get the fastest feedback loop after docs-reading.
3. “Docs” issues (that are more than typos): README improvements, missing examples, clearer setup—easy to validate and low risk.
4. “Enhancement” issues that match the README’s architecture: e.g., small feature additions rather than big refactors.

[arthurrochamoreira]

Many maintainers use specific labels to flag tasks that don't require deep architectural knowledge, such as "good first issue" for simple and isolated tasks, "help wanted" for general needs where complexity may vary, and "first-timers-only" for issues exclusively reserved for those who have never contributed to the project before.

[sudoUgando]

My suggestions are:
Help wanted”/ good first issue: issues explicitly designed for contributors; typically clearer scope and expectations.
Bug or “regression” issues with reproduction steps: you’ll get the fastest feedback loop after docs-reading.
“Docs” issues (that are more than typos): README improvements, missing examples, clearer setup—easy to validate and low risk.
“Enhancement” issues that match the README’s architecture: e.g., small feature additions rather than big refactors.