-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.8k
rustdoc panics while documenting panicking associated constant #131625
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
A-const-evalArea: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)C-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.P-lowLow priorityLow priorityT-rustdocRelevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.regression-from-stable-to-stablePerformance or correctness regression from one stable version to another.Performance or correctness regression from one stable version to another.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-const-evalArea: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)C-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.P-lowLow priorityLow priorityT-rustdocRelevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.regression-from-stable-to-stablePerformance or correctness regression from one stable version to another.Performance or correctness regression from one stable version to another.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
I have the following code:
While this is contrived, this pattern is used in real codebases to take advantage of post-monomorphization errors (PME's), for example here.
When running
cargo doc, rustdoc seems to try to evaluate the constant, and crashes:Miscellaneous