You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Automatic differentiation could provide significant improvement in optimizing microlensing models, as well as posterior probability analysis using Hamiltonian Markov Chain Monte Carlo. A place to start might be a circular, uniform source with a single lens. This can be expressed analytically in terms of elliptic integrals, which can be handled with autodiff:
Another simple case would be a single, straight caustic with a limb-darkened source - this has an analytic expression in terms of elliptic integrals as well:
Gaussian processes could be used to detect microlensing events in the presence of quasi-periodic variability or correlated noise. Our recent implementation of a fast Gaussian process technique might help make this possible for large datasets:
@rodluger @dfm
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...430..505W
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...579..430A
Another simple case would be a single, straight caustic with a limb-darkened source - this has an analytic expression in terms of elliptic integrals as well:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJ...314..154S
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996MNRAS.279..571A
https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9912050
https://celerite.readthedocs.io/en/stable/