Skip to content

Move Alumni to Prior CM Status #278

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
shaeespring wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
+9 −6
Open

Move Alumni to Prior CM Status #278

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
15 changes: 9 additions & 6 deletions constitution.tex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -729,8 +729,12 @@ \subsection{Modifying the Constitution}

\asection{Constitutional Maintainers}

\asubsection{Constitutional Maintainer Selection}
Any member may nominate a qualified member for Maintainer status to E-Board for consideration.
E-Board may choose to approve or reject the nomination by E-Board Vote with a quorum of seventy-five percent.

\asubsection{Constitutional Maintainer Qualifications}
Maintainers must be Active or Alumni Members.
Maintainers must be Active Members.
Copy link
Member

@pikachu0542 pikachu0542 Feb 9, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we change this to say "Candidates must be Active Members"? That makes it consistent with the E-Board and RTP sections.I feel like this also makes more sense given that this amendment would also be adding Prior Maintainer status for Alumni.

Copy link

@tallen42 tallen42 Feb 12, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it is fair to say that Candidates must be active, but that Maintainers don't need to be.


\asubsection{Constitutional Maintainer Expectations}
Maintainers are expected to:
Expand All @@ -743,13 +747,12 @@ \subsection{Modifying the Constitution}
Failure to meet any of these expectations is grounds for revocation of Maintainer status by E-Board.

\asubsection{Constitutional Maintainer Term}
Maintainer status lasts until it is resigned, or until it is revoked by an E-Board Vote.
A Maintainer may resign at any time by notifying the current E-Board and Maintainer group.
If a Maintainer no longer satisfies \ref{Constitutional Maintainer Qualifications}, they lose Maintainer status.
Copy link
Contributor

@mxmeinhold mxmeinhold Feb 7, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm. everyone loses status if no longer active? extensions don't come into play here

Maintainer status otherwise lasts until it is resigned, or until it is revoked by an E-Board Vote.
A Maintainer may resign at any time by notifying the current E-Board and Maintainer group.

\asubsection{Constitutional Maintainer Selection}
Any member may nominate a qualified member for Maintainer status to E-Board for consideration.
E-Board may choose to approve or reject the nomination by E-Board Vote with a quorum of seventy-five percent.
\asubsection{Prior Constitutional Maintainers}
Prior Constitutional Maintainers are those members who are no longer current Active Members and have not been granted an extension by the current Constitutional Maintainers.

\asection{Root Type Persons}
The OpComm Directorship is responsible for overseeing the implementation of maintenance and upgrades to the CSH computer systems networks.
Expand Down