ctsm5.4.031: bug fix to the FATES land use driver input code#3902
Open
adrifoster wants to merge 1 commit intoESCOMP:masterfrom
Open
ctsm5.4.031: bug fix to the FATES land use driver input code#3902adrifoster wants to merge 1 commit intoESCOMP:masterfrom
adrifoster wants to merge 1 commit intoESCOMP:masterfrom
Conversation
adrifoster
changed the title
adrifoster
changed the title
samsrabin
added
non-bfb
samsrabin
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes
This PR includes a cherry-picked fix from NorESMhub/CTSM #209 to address swap in the order of rangeland and pasture in the reading of the landuse drivers.
Specific notes
Contributors other than yourself, if any: @rosiealice
Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? Yes - for FATES land use runs
Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? No
Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? No
Testing performed, if any: