Integration test fixes

[ahoffer]

What does this PR do?

Patch up how itests are run. DDF integration tests pass locally.
Builds off of Zac's upgrade-karaf PR

Who is reviewing it?

@zkirksey
@clockard
@jrnorth
@jaymcnallie

Select relevant component teams:

@codice/test

Ask 2 committers to review/merge the PR and tag them here.

@clockard
@jrnorth

How should this be tested?

Clone, build, and run integration tests

Any background context you want to provide?

What are the relevant tickets?

N/A

Screenshots

None

Checklist:

• [NO] Documentation Updated
• [NO] Update / Add Threat Dragon models
• [NO ] Update / Add Unit Tests
• Update / Add Integration Tests

Notes on Review Process

No notes

Review Comment Legend:

• ✏️ (Pencil) This comment is a nitpick or style suggestion, no action required for approval. This comment should provide a suggestion either as an in line code snippet or a gist.
• ❓ (Question Mark) This comment is to gain a clearer understanding of design or code choices, clarification is required but action may not be necessary for approval.
• ❗ (Exclamation Mark) This comment is critical and requires clarification or action before approval.

[zkirksey]

Looks like we need to update the branches covered ratio in catalog-solr-solrclient:

Other than this error, I was able to get the full build to pass with tests (including itests).

[zkirksey]

Formatting error: