Skip to content

ci: use docker/cagent-action/.github/workflows/review-pr.yml#24132

Open
dvdksn wants to merge 1 commit intodocker:mainfrom
dvdksn:use-cagent-review-action
Open

ci: use docker/cagent-action/.github/workflows/review-pr.yml#24132
dvdksn wants to merge 1 commit intodocker:mainfrom
dvdksn:use-cagent-review-action

Conversation

@dvdksn
Copy link
Contributor

@dvdksn dvdksn commented Feb 11, 2026

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 11, 2026

Deploy Preview for docsdocker ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 44692cc
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/docsdocker/deploys/6990ac088ba7a70008341792
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-24132--docsdocker.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@github-actions github-actions bot added area/release Relates to CI or deployment ci ci updates labels Feb 11, 2026
@dvdksn dvdksn requested a review from derekmisler February 11, 2026 14:55
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Workflow refactoring looks good! ✅

This PR successfully migrates from an inline agent configuration to using the reusable workflow from docker/cagent-action. The configuration is clear and well-structured with no documentation quality issues found.

The additional-prompt parameter appropriately configures the review agent with clear instructions and guidelines. The content is technically accurate and suitable for its purpose as agent configuration.

Copy link

@derekmisler derekmisler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the only reason i haven't approved this yet is because we need this one to land first, or the prompt files will be ignored

Comment on lines 20 to 21
with:
cagent-version: v1.22.0

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dvdksn you can delete this part, cagent-action has been updated to the latest-and-greatest!

@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

@dvdksn could we make it aware of pages being removed, and for those to check if a correct redirect is added? i.e., to prevent things like #23949 (comment)

@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

I think we were also looking at (or already have?) helping with triage; for 404 reports, it could also check wayback-machine to verify if it was a page that previously existed to exclude reports for made-up links 🤔 (if I'm not sure, I usually do a quick check to see if there was anything at that URL in the first place #23949 (comment))

@dvdksn
Copy link
Contributor Author

dvdksn commented Feb 14, 2026

@thaJeztah yes that would be a good addition. Let me update the instruction 👍

@dvdksn
Copy link
Contributor Author

dvdksn commented Feb 14, 2026

@thaJeztah for 404 - yes, for the triage agent (todo) we could probably just add a tool to check the wayback api, eg: https://archive.org/wayback/available?url=docs.docker.com/engine/reference/builder

Signed-off-by: David Karlsson <35727626+dvdksn@users.noreply.github.com>
@dvdksn dvdksn force-pushed the use-cagent-review-action branch from f3b26ff to 44692cc Compare February 14, 2026 17:08
@dvdksn dvdksn requested a review from a team February 14, 2026 17:08
@dvdksn dvdksn requested a review from derekmisler February 14, 2026 17:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/release Relates to CI or deployment ci ci updates status/review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants