Skip to content

[release-1.37] Run make generated-files#3970

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intorelease-1.37from
auto/update-generated-files-release-1.37
Apr 21, 2026
Merged

[release-1.37] Run make generated-files#3970
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intorelease-1.37from
auto/update-generated-files-release-1.37

Conversation

@serverless-qe
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Generated by running make generated-files

@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the auto/update-generated-files-release-1.37 branch from 7843bfd to 22c074d Compare February 3, 2026 15:55
@simkam
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

simkam commented Feb 4, 2026

/retest-required

@simkam
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

simkam commented Feb 5, 2026

/test 420-test-upgrade

1 similar comment
@simkam
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

simkam commented Feb 6, 2026

/test 420-test-upgrade

@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the auto/update-generated-files-release-1.37 branch from 22c074d to eaafe15 Compare February 9, 2026 18:10
@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the auto/update-generated-files-release-1.37 branch 6 times, most recently from 39fee99 to 6bf0d9d Compare February 26, 2026 11:25
@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the auto/update-generated-files-release-1.37 branch 4 times, most recently from 48c63f7 to 0fa4456 Compare February 27, 2026 08:20
@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the auto/update-generated-files-release-1.37 branch from 0fa4456 to adc1812 Compare March 6, 2026 13:48
@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the auto/update-generated-files-release-1.37 branch from adc1812 to ffcf7ed Compare March 17, 2026 13:57
@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the auto/update-generated-files-release-1.37 branch from ffcf7ed to f6f213b Compare April 20, 2026 12:41
@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the auto/update-generated-files-release-1.37 branch from f6f213b to c865c1f Compare April 21, 2026 09:53
@dsimansk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dsimansk, serverless-qe

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@dsimansk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

@openshift-merge-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 08f54f1 and 2 for PR HEAD c865c1f in total

@dsimansk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/override ?

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

@dsimansk: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • ?

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / serverless-index-137-fbc-422-on-pull-request
  • Update deps
  • ci/prow/420-images
  • ci/prow/420-kitchensink-e2e
  • ci/prow/420-kitchensink-upgrade
  • ci/prow/420-mesh-e2e
  • ci/prow/420-mesh-upgrade
  • ci/prow/420-operator-e2e
  • ci/prow/420-test-upgrade
  • ci/prow/420-upstream-e2e
  • ci/prow/420-upstream-e2e-kafka
  • pull-ci-openshift-knative-serverless-operator-main-420-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-knative-serverless-operator-main-420-kitchensink-e2e
  • pull-ci-openshift-knative-serverless-operator-main-420-kitchensink-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-knative-serverless-operator-main-420-mesh-e2e
  • pull-ci-openshift-knative-serverless-operator-main-420-mesh-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-knative-serverless-operator-main-420-operator-e2e
  • pull-ci-openshift-knative-serverless-operator-main-420-test-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-knative-serverless-operator-main-420-upstream-e2e
  • pull-ci-openshift-knative-serverless-operator-main-420-upstream-e2e-kafka
  • tide

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

Details

In response to this:

/override ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@dsimansk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/override "ci/prow/420-kitchensink-e2e"
/override "ci/prow/420-kitchensink-upgrade"
/override "ci/prow/420-mesh-e2e"
/override "ci/prow/420-mesh-upgrade"
/override "ci/prow/420-operator-e2e"
/override "ci/prow/420-test-upgrade"
/override "ci/prow/420-upstream-e2e"
/override "ci/prow/420-upstream-e2e-kafka"
/override "Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / serverless-index-137-fbc-422-on-pull-request"

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

@dsimansk: Overrode contexts on behalf of dsimansk: Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / serverless-index-137-fbc-422-on-pull-request, ci/prow/420-kitchensink-e2e, ci/prow/420-kitchensink-upgrade, ci/prow/420-mesh-e2e, ci/prow/420-mesh-upgrade, ci/prow/420-operator-e2e, ci/prow/420-test-upgrade, ci/prow/420-upstream-e2e, ci/prow/420-upstream-e2e-kafka

Details

In response to this:

/override "ci/prow/420-kitchensink-e2e"
/override "ci/prow/420-kitchensink-upgrade"
/override "ci/prow/420-mesh-e2e"
/override "ci/prow/420-mesh-upgrade"
/override "ci/prow/420-operator-e2e"
/override "ci/prow/420-test-upgrade"
/override "ci/prow/420-upstream-e2e"
/override "ci/prow/420-upstream-e2e-kafka"
/override "Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / serverless-index-137-fbc-422-on-pull-request"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit f356f24 into release-1.37 Apr 21, 2026
34 of 35 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants