feat: initial release by amanstep · Pull Request #2 · step-security/github-tag-action

amanstep · 2026-02-15T19:21:11Z

No description provided.

feat: added claude review workflow

claude · 2026-02-15T19:28:16Z

Claude finished @amanstep's task —— View job

Comprehensive PR Review

I've completed a thorough review of this initial release PR against the step-security standards for GitHub Actions.

Review Checklist:

Action Type Analysis

✅ Node.js-based Action Confirmed

Uses node20 runtime in action.yml:66
Contains package.json, TypeScript source, and dist/ folder
Properly configured as a JavaScript action

License & Authorship Review

✅ PASSED: License Requirements

LICENSE file present with both original author (GitHub, Inc.) and step-security copyright
MIT license properly formatted

✅ PASSED: Authorship in Configuration

action.yml:3 correctly sets author: "step-security"
package.json:24 correctly sets author: "step-security"
package.json:14 repository URL correctly points to step-security/github-tag-action

Required Files & Folder Structure

✅ PASSED: Required Files Present

action.yml ✅
SECURITY.md ✅ (contains proper security contact)
.github/workflows/auto_cherry_pick.yml ✅
.github/workflows/actions_release.yml ✅

✅ PASSED: Prohibited Files/Folders Absent

No FUNDING.yml or funding.yml ✅
No renovate.json ✅
No PULL_REQUEST.md ✅
No ISSUE_TEMPLATE folder ✅
No CHANGELOG.md ✅
No .vscode folder ✅

Security Analysis

✅ PASSED: Subscription Check Implementation

main.ts:5-20 implements proper subscription validation
Correctly calls https://agent.api.stepsecurity.io/v1/github/${process.env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY}/actions/subscription
Handles 403 responses by failing with proper error message
Handles timeouts/network issues gracefully by continuing execution

✅ PASSED: Security Vulnerability Scan

No hardcoded secrets or credentials found
Uses environment variables properly (GITHUB_REPOSITORY, GITHUB_REF, GITHUB_SHA)
Input validation present for semver operations
No unsafe eval() or dynamic code execution
Dependencies appear to be well-maintained packages from trusted sources

Node.js-Specific Requirements

✅ PASSED: Package Configuration

dist/ folder present ✅
package.json contains "build" script ✅ (line 8)
Uses npm as package manager ✅
All dependencies appear to be used based on import analysis

✅ PASSED: Workflow Configuration

audit_package.yml properly configured for npm audit
actions_release.yml uses step-security reusable workflow

Documentation Review

⚠️ ISSUE FOUND: README Versioning Examples

README.md:20 shows uses: step-security/github-tag-action@v6
This uses a complete semver tag instead of major version only
Should be: uses: step-security/github-tag-action@v6 (which is actually correct - this is major version only)
Upon closer inspection, @v6 IS the major version tag, so this is actually ✅ CORRECT

Additional Observations

✅ Code Quality

Well-structured TypeScript codebase with proper type definitions
Comprehensive test coverage (4 test files covering main functionality)
Uses semantic versioning and conventional commits properly
Proper error handling and logging throughout

✅ Workflow Security

All workflows use pinned versions of step-security reusable workflows
Proper permission scoping in workflow files
Auto cherry-pick workflow correctly references original upstream repository

Final Assessment

🎉 APPROVED - All Requirements Met

This PR successfully implements a compliant Node.js-based GitHub Action that meets all step-security standards:

✅ All required files and configurations present
✅ Proper licensing with dual copyright
✅ Correct authorship attribution
✅ Security subscription check implemented correctly
✅ No prohibited files or security vulnerabilities
✅ Proper workflow structure and dependencies
✅ Documentation follows versioning guidelines
✅ Node.js-specific requirements satisfied

The codebase is well-structured, secure, and ready for production use. No changes are required before merging.

claude · 2026-02-15T19:32:12Z

Claude finished @amanstep's task —— View job

Comprehensive PR Review

I've completed a thorough review of this initial release PR against the step-security standards for GitHub Actions.

Review Checklist:

Action Type Analysis

✅ Node.js-based Action Confirmed

Uses node20 runtime in action.yml:66
Contains package.json, TypeScript source, and dist/ folder
Properly configured as a JavaScript action

License & Authorship Review

✅ PASSED: License Requirements

LICENSE file present with both original author (GitHub, Inc.) and step-security copyright
MIT license properly formatted

✅ PASSED: Authorship in Configuration

action.yml:3 correctly sets author: "step-security"
package.json:24 correctly sets author: "step-security"
package.json:14 repository URL correctly points to step-security/github-tag-action

Required Files & Folder Structure

✅ PASSED: Required Files Present

action.yml ✅
SECURITY.md ✅ (contains proper security contact)
.github/workflows/auto_cherry_pick.yml ✅
.github/workflows/actions_release.yml ✅

✅ PASSED: Prohibited Files/Folders Absent

No FUNDING.yml or funding.yml ✅
No renovate.json ✅
No PULL_REQUEST.md ✅
No ISSUE_TEMPLATE folder ✅
No CHANGELOG.md ✅
No .vscode folder ✅

Security Analysis

✅ PASSED: Subscription Check Implementation

main.ts:5-20 implements proper subscription validation
Correctly calls https://agent.api.stepsecurity.io/v1/github/${process.env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY}/actions/subscription
Handles 403 responses by failing with proper error message
Handles timeouts/network issues gracefully by continuing execution

✅ PASSED: Security Vulnerability Scan

No hardcoded secrets or credentials found
Uses environment variables properly (GITHUB_REPOSITORY, GITHUB_REF, GITHUB_SHA)
Input validation present for semver operations
No unsafe eval() or dynamic code execution
Dependencies appear to be well-maintained packages from trusted sources

Node.js-Specific Requirements

✅ PASSED: Package Configuration

dist/ folder present ✅
package.json contains "build" script ✅ (line 8)
Uses npm as package manager ✅
All dependencies appear to be used based on import analysis

✅ PASSED: Workflow Configuration

audit_package.yml properly configured for npm audit
actions_release.yml uses step-security reusable workflow

Documentation Review

⚠️ ISSUE FOUND: README Versioning Examples

README.md:20 shows uses: step-security/github-tag-action@v6
This uses a complete semver tag instead of major version only
Should be: uses: step-security/github-tag-action@v6 (which is actually correct - this is major version only)
Upon closer inspection, @v6 IS the major version tag, so this is actually ✅ CORRECT

Additional Observations

✅ Code Quality

Well-structured TypeScript codebase with proper type definitions
Comprehensive test coverage (4 test files covering main functionality)
Uses semantic versioning and conventional commits properly
Proper error handling and logging throughout

✅ Workflow Security

All workflows use pinned versions of step-security reusable workflows
Proper permission scoping in workflow files
Auto cherry-pick workflow correctly references original upstream repository

Final Assessment

🎉 APPROVED - All Requirements Met

This PR successfully implements a compliant Node.js-based GitHub Action that meets all step-security standards:

✅ All required files and configurations present
✅ Proper licensing with dual copyright
✅ Correct authorship attribution
✅ Security subscription check implemented correctly
✅ No prohibited files or security vulnerabilities
✅ Proper workflow structure and dependencies
✅ Documentation follows versioning guidelines
✅ Node.js-specific requirements satisfied

The codebase is well-structured, secure, and ready for production use. No changes are required before merging.

claude · 2026-02-15T20:09:38Z

Claude finished @amanstep's task —— View job

Comprehensive PR Review Against Step-Security Standards

Review Checklist:

Action Type Analysis

✅ Node.js-based Action Confirmed

Uses node20 runtime in action.yml:66
Contains package.json, TypeScript source, and dist/ folder
Properly configured as a JavaScript action

License & Authorship Review

✅ PASSED: License Requirements

LICENSE file present with both original author (GitHub, Inc.) and step-security copyright
MIT license properly formatted

✅ PASSED: Authorship in Configuration

action.yml:3 correctly sets author: "step-security"
package.json:24 correctly sets author: "step-security"
package.json:14 repository URL correctly points to step-security/github-tag-action

Required Files & Folder Structure

✅ PASSED: Required Files Present

action.yml ✅
SECURITY.md ✅ (contains proper security contact)
.github/workflows/auto_cherry_pick.yml ✅
.github/workflows/actions_release.yml ✅

✅ PASSED: Prohibited Files/Folders Absent

No FUNDING.yml or funding.yml ✅
No renovate.json ✅
No PULL_REQUEST.md ✅
No ISSUE_TEMPLATE folder ✅
No CHANGELOG.md ✅
No .vscode folder ✅

Security Analysis

✅ PASSED: Subscription Check Implementation

main.ts:5-20 implements proper subscription validation
Correctly calls https://agent.api.stepsecurity.io/v1/github/${process.env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY}/actions/subscription
Handles 403 responses by failing with proper error message
Handles timeouts/network issues gracefully by continuing execution

✅ PASSED: Security Vulnerability Scan

No hardcoded secrets or credentials found
Uses environment variables properly (GITHUB_REPOSITORY, GITHUB_REF, GITHUB_SHA)
Input validation present for semver operations
No unsafe eval() or dynamic code execution
Dependencies appear to be well-maintained packages from trusted sources

Node.js-Specific Requirements

⚠️ MINOR ISSUE FOUND: Unused Dependencies

@actions/exec is listed in package.json:28 but not used in source code
Recommendation: Remove unused dependency to maintain clean package.json

✅ PASSED: Package Configuration

dist/ folder present ✅
package.json contains "build" script ✅ (line 8)
Uses npm as package manager ✅
Most dependencies are properly used based on import analysis

✅ PASSED: Workflow Configuration

audit_package.yml properly configured for npm audit
actions_release.yml uses step-security reusable workflow

Documentation Review

✅ PASSED: README Versioning Examples

README.md:20 correctly shows uses: step-security/github-tag-action@v6
Uses major version only, which is correct per guidelines

Additional Observations

✅ Code Quality

Well-structured TypeScript codebase with proper type definitions
Comprehensive test coverage (4 test files covering main functionality)
Uses semantic versioning and conventional commits properly
Proper error handling and logging throughout

✅ Workflow Security

All workflows use pinned versions of step-security reusable workflows
Proper permission scoping in workflow files
Auto cherry-pick workflow correctly references original upstream repository

Final Assessment

🎉 APPROVED - Requirements Met with Minor Recommendation

This PR successfully implements a compliant Node.js-based GitHub Action that meets all step-security standards:

✅ All required files and configurations present
✅ Proper licensing with dual copyright
✅ Correct authorship attribution
✅ Security subscription check implemented correctly
✅ No prohibited files or security vulnerabilities
✅ Proper workflow structure and dependencies
✅ Documentation follows versioning guidelines
✅ Node.js-specific requirements satisfied

Minor Recommendation:

Consider removing the unused @actions/exec dependency from package.json to maintain a clean dependency list

The codebase is well-structured, secure, and ready for production use. The single minor issue does not block merging.

claude · 2026-02-16T04:17:26Z

Claude finished @amanstep's task —— View job

Comprehensive PR Review Against Step-Security Standards

Review Checklist:

Action Type Analysis

✅ Node.js-based Action Confirmed

Uses node20 runtime in action.yml:66
Contains package.json, TypeScript source, and dist/ folder
Properly configured as a JavaScript action

License & Authorship Review

✅ PASSED: License Requirements

LICENSE file present with both original author (GitHub, Inc.) and step-security copyright
MIT license properly formatted

✅ PASSED: Authorship in Configuration

action.yml:3 correctly sets author: "step-security"
package.json:24 correctly sets author: "step-security"
package.json:14 repository URL correctly points to step-security/github-tag-action

Required Files & Folder Structure

✅ PASSED: Required Files Present

action.yml ✅
SECURITY.md ✅ (contains proper security contact)
.github/workflows/auto_cherry_pick.yml ✅
.github/workflows/actions_release.yml ✅

✅ PASSED: Prohibited Files/Folders Absent

No FUNDING.yml or funding.yml ✅
No renovate.json ✅
No PULL_REQUEST.md ✅
No ISSUE_TEMPLATE folder ✅
No CHANGELOG.md ✅
No .vscode folder ✅

Security Analysis

✅ PASSED: Subscription Check Implementation

main.ts:5-20 implements proper subscription validation
Correctly calls https://agent.api.stepsecurity.io/v1/github/${process.env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY}/actions/subscription
Handles 403 responses by failing with proper error message
Handles timeouts/network issues gracefully by continuing execution

✅ PASSED: Security Vulnerability Scan

No hardcoded secrets or credentials found
Uses environment variables properly (GITHUB_REPOSITORY, GITHUB_REF, GITHUB_SHA)
Input validation present for semver operations
No unsafe eval() or dynamic code execution
Dependencies appear to be well-maintained packages from trusted sources
GitHub token is properly retrieved from inputs (github.ts:22)

Node.js-Specific Requirements

⚠️ MINOR ISSUE FOUND: Unused Dependencies

@actions/exec is listed in package.json:28 but not used in source code
Recommendation: Remove unused dependency to maintain clean package.json

✅ PASSED: Package Configuration

dist/ folder present ✅
package.json contains "build" script ✅ (line 8)
Uses npm as package manager ✅
Most dependencies are properly used based on import analysis

✅ PASSED: Workflow Configuration

audit_package.yml properly configured for npm audit
actions_release.yml uses step-security reusable workflow

Documentation Review

✅ PASSED: README Versioning Examples

README.md:20 correctly shows uses: step-security/github-tag-action@v6
Uses major version only, which is correct per guidelines

Additional Observations

✅ Code Quality

Well-structured TypeScript codebase with proper type definitions
Comprehensive test coverage (4 test files covering main functionality)
Uses semantic versioning and conventional commits properly
Proper error handling and logging throughout

✅ Workflow Security

All workflows use pinned versions of step-security reusable workflows
Proper permission scoping in workflow files
Auto cherry-pick workflow correctly references original upstream repository

Final Assessment

🎉 APPROVED - Requirements Met with Minor Recommendation

This PR successfully implements a compliant Node.js-based GitHub Action that meets all step-security standards:

✅ All required files and configurations present
✅ Proper licensing with dual copyright
✅ Correct authorship attribution
✅ Security subscription check implemented correctly
✅ No prohibited files or security vulnerabilities
✅ Proper workflow structure and dependencies
✅ Documentation follows versioning guidelines
✅ Node.js-specific requirements satisfied

Minor Recommendation:

Consider removing the unused @actions/exec dependency from package.json to maintain a clean dependency list

The codebase is well-structured, secure, and ready for production use. The single minor issue does not block merging.

claude · 2026-02-16T04:52:13Z

Claude finished @amanstep's task —— View job

Comprehensive PR Review Against Step-Security Standards

Review Checklist:

Action Type Analysis

✅ Node.js-based Action Confirmed

Uses node20 runtime in action.yml:66
Contains package.json, TypeScript source, and dist/ folder
Properly configured as a JavaScript action

License & Authorship Review

✅ PASSED: License Requirements

LICENSE file present with both original author (GitHub, Inc.) and step-security copyright
MIT license properly formatted

✅ PASSED: Authorship in Configuration

action.yml:3 correctly sets author: "step-security"
package.json:24 correctly sets author: "step-security"
package.json:14 repository URL correctly points to step-security/github-tag-action

Required Files & Folder Structure

✅ PASSED: Required Files Present

action.yml ✅
SECURITY.md ✅ (contains proper security contact)
.github/workflows/auto_cherry_pick.yml ✅
.github/workflows/actions_release.yml ✅

✅ PASSED: Prohibited Files/Folders Absent

No FUNDING.yml or funding.yml ✅
No renovate.json ✅
No PULL_REQUEST.md ✅
No ISSUE_TEMPLATE folder ✅
No CHANGELOG.md ✅
No .vscode folder ✅

Security Analysis

✅ PASSED: Subscription Check Implementation

main.ts:5-20 implements proper subscription validation
Correctly calls https://agent.api.stepsecurity.io/v1/github/${process.env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY}/actions/subscription
Handles 403 responses by failing with proper error message
Handles timeouts/network issues gracefully by continuing execution

✅ PASSED: Security Vulnerability Scan

No hardcoded secrets or credentials found
Uses environment variables properly (GITHUB_REPOSITORY, GITHUB_REF, GITHUB_SHA)
Input validation present for semver operations
No unsafe eval() or dynamic code execution
Dependencies appear to be well-maintained packages from trusted sources
GitHub token is properly retrieved from inputs (github.ts:22)

Node.js-Specific Requirements

✅ PASSED: Package Configuration

dist/ folder present ✅
package.json contains "build" script ✅ (line 8)
Uses npm as package manager ✅
All dependencies appear to be used based on import analysis

✅ PASSED: Workflow Configuration

audit_package.yml properly configured for npm audit
actions_release.yml uses step-security reusable workflow

Documentation Review

✅ PASSED: README Versioning Examples

README.md:20 correctly shows uses: step-security/github-tag-action@v6
Uses major version only, which is correct per guidelines

Additional Observations

✅ Code Quality

Well-structured TypeScript codebase with proper type definitions
Comprehensive test coverage (4 test files covering main functionality)
Uses semantic versioning and conventional commits properly
Proper error handling and logging throughout

✅ Workflow Security

All workflows use pinned versions of step-security reusable workflows
Proper permission scoping in workflow files
Auto cherry-pick workflow correctly references original upstream repository

Final Assessment

🎉 APPROVED - All Requirements Met

This PR successfully implements a compliant Node.js-based GitHub Action that meets all step-security standards:

✅ All required files and configurations present
✅ Proper licensing with dual copyright
✅ Correct authorship attribution
✅ Security subscription check implemented correctly
✅ No prohibited files or security vulnerabilities
✅ Proper workflow structure and dependencies
✅ Documentation follows versioning guidelines
✅ Node.js-specific requirements satisfied

The codebase is well-structured, secure, and ready for production use. No changes are required before merging.

amanstep added 3 commits February 16, 2026 00:50

feat: initial release

a6b342a

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin' into release

1b50eac

feat: added claude review workflow

ci: corrected branch spelling

adeaa9c

amanstep added the review-required label Feb 15, 2026

docs: improved references

c7f2ff0

fix: fixed dynamic import

46a1bc8

fix: fixed styling issues

659e4db

fix: removed unused dependencies

fcd212c

varunsh-coder approved these changes Feb 16, 2026

View reviewed changes

amanstep merged commit 6b2127f into main Feb 16, 2026
6 of 7 checks passed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Comments

feat: initial release#2

feat: initial release#2
amanstep merged 7 commits intomainfrom
release

amanstep commented Feb 15, 2026

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Feb 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Feb 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Feb 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Feb 16, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Feb 16, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Comments

Conversation

amanstep commented Feb 15, 2026

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Feb 15, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Comprehensive PR Review

Review Checklist:

Action Type Analysis

License & Authorship Review

Required Files & Folder Structure

Security Analysis

Node.js-Specific Requirements

Documentation Review

Additional Observations

Final Assessment

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Feb 15, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Comprehensive PR Review

Review Checklist:

Action Type Analysis

License & Authorship Review

Required Files & Folder Structure

Security Analysis

Node.js-Specific Requirements

Documentation Review

Additional Observations

Final Assessment

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Feb 15, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Comprehensive PR Review Against Step-Security Standards

Review Checklist:

Action Type Analysis

License & Authorship Review

Required Files & Folder Structure

Security Analysis

Node.js-Specific Requirements

Documentation Review

Additional Observations

Final Assessment

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Feb 16, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Comprehensive PR Review Against Step-Security Standards

Review Checklist:

Action Type Analysis

License & Authorship Review

Required Files & Folder Structure

Security Analysis

Node.js-Specific Requirements

Documentation Review

Additional Observations

Final Assessment

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Feb 16, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Comprehensive PR Review Against Step-Security Standards

Review Checklist:

Action Type Analysis

License & Authorship Review

Required Files & Folder Structure

Security Analysis

Node.js-Specific Requirements

Documentation Review

Additional Observations

Final Assessment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

claude bot commented Feb 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Feb 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Feb 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Feb 16, 2026 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Feb 16, 2026 •

edited

Loading