Add note about Rosetta for old protoc-gen-rpc-java#2815
Merged
Conversation
I tripped over newer MacOS not installing Rosetta by default when we were silently relying on that to cover for the version of protoc-gen-rpc-java not shipping MacOS aarch64 binaries. I'm adding a note to CONTRIBUTING.md and comments in the relevant gradle files so other developers have some hope of not falling down the same rabbit hole I did.
mjameswh
approved these changes
Mar 24, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What was changed
protoc-gen-rpc-javaexecutable selection in gradle filesWhy?
I tripped over newer MacOS not installing Rosetta by default when we were silently relying on that to cover for the version of protoc-gen-rpc-java not shipping MacOS aarch64 binaries. I'm adding a note to CONTRIBUTING.md and comments in the relevant gradle files so other developers have some hope of not falling down the same rabbit hole I did.
Checklist
Closes
How was this tested: